/build/static/layout/Breadcrumb_cap_w.png

Server/Agent ver 5.3 combination

In December I upgraded both server and clients to 5.3 - (Server 5.3.47927) (Client 5.3.47657) and we pushed the client upgrade through GPO and included in our image process. All of the clients (90%) stopped checking in. I found the issue to be the amp.conf does not contain the information it did in previous versions like hostname, ampurl, companyname, plashtext, localhost... A few clients had no issues with the transition with no rhyme or reason why. What is the best corrective action to push out the correct information to the non-reporting clients?

0 Comments   [ + ] Show comments

Answers (4)

Posted by: GillySpy 12 years ago
7th Degree Black Belt
0
when you pushed it out did you rename the msi or add a host name parm?
http://www.kace.com/support/kb/index.php?action=artikel&cat=2&id=848&artlang=en#5_3_Agent

you can correct it by removing it and redeploying it with those settings. OR

the defaults are for it to look for a server call "K1000". you could:
1) create a CNAME DNS record to point to your real kbox.
2) After they all connect you can remove the CNAME record.
3) They will update themselves at step 2 with the real kbox host name as a backup (lasthost)
4) they will reconnect and fail on the cname and try the backup name
5) the backup name will become primary (host)
Posted by: icn2pcs 12 years ago
Orange Belt
0
We used the same procedure as before by renaming the msi to include the hostname of the kbox which worked on the previous version. We were told not to reconfig the parameters of the msi anymore.
Posted by: GillySpy 12 years ago
7th Degree Black Belt
0
Ok. I suggest a support ticket so someone can reproduce / verify and log an issue. To get you over the hump could you also try the HOST=technique on the command line? perhaps call it with a batch?
Posted by: cmccracken 12 years ago
Orange Senior Belt
0
When I ran into forgetful amp.conf files I ran:

amptools.exe -resetconf host=kboxnamehere

I used PSExec because we didn't have that many, but I think you could also push it with a GPO.

Casey
Rating comments in this legacy AppDeploy message board thread won't reorder them,
so that the conversation will remain readable.
 
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site and/or clicking the "Accept" button you are providing consent Quest Software and its affiliates do NOT sell the Personal Data you provide to us either when you register on our websites or when you do business with us. For more information about our Privacy Policy and our data protection efforts, please visit GDPR-HQ