Driver Install Frameworks (DIFx) version 2.1
Has anyone looking into what has changed in Version 2.1? Looks like Vista support has been added but the same limitation on working with unsigned drivers exist.
TIA
TIA
0 Comments
[ + ] Show comments
Answers (3)
Please log in to answer
Posted by:
kkaminsk
17 years ago
Can't you work around the unsigned driver issue by doing internal signing? Sorry it has been a while since I have looked at this.
Posted by:
sss
17 years ago
Hey KKaminski.... I have not had time to setup/test the internal signing. These requests pop-up too infrequently. I have just been using DPInst.exe and using the Legacy switch (as a custom action) to ge the job done. This will burn you on a machine where a user w/o Admin rights needs insert hardware for the first time.
SS
SS
Posted by:
kkaminsk
17 years ago
To be honest I always liked DPInst a bit better. I think in the older versions it was better at getting the .inf file order if you needed to install multiple drivers but that was quite a while ago.
Rating comments in this legacy AppDeploy message board thread won't reorder them,so that the conversation will remain readable.