Hello All,

I am looking for an answer to the below query...
Query: How many transforms can we pass to the TRANSFORMS property at a time.
0 Comments   [ + ] Show Comments

Comments

Please log in to comment

Rating comments in this legacy AppDeploy message board thread won't reorder them,
so that the conversation will remain readable.

Answers

0
Great question!

I don't know but I'd imagine that the number is unlimited but there is probably a limit to the length of the string that the engine will handle. By that, I mean you could probably have many, many more transforms if they were all named with, say, a single letter and number (or double-letter...you get the idea) than if they were named like: "This is the English United States transform which includes the customisations for Accounts, Human Resources and Operations."

What that limit is...my guess would be 255 characters (255 is a popular number in Windows!) but I think it would be better answered in the MSDN Windows Installer web session or newsgroup.
Answered 08/27/2009 by: VBScab
Red Belt

Please log in to comment
0
Hi,

Thank you for the hint..[;)]. One of my friends found this -> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa367576(VS.85).aspx

Note
A Windows Installer package can apply no more than 255 transforms when installing an application or update. When many transforms are necessary, they should be combined and previous obsolete transforms should be eliminated.
Answered 08/27/2009 by: the_apostate
Senior Yellow Belt

Please log in to comment
0
Only 255 transforms?... sounds limited [:D]
Answered 08/31/2009 by: AngelD
Red Belt

Please log in to comment
0
I'm also disappointed, I'm switching it OSX Leopard!
Answered 08/31/2009 by: turbokitty
Sixth Degree Black Belt

Please log in to comment
0
I wouldn't want to work on a package with 255 transforms please.. lol [8D]
Answered 08/31/2009 by: LB3
Senior Yellow Belt

Please log in to comment
0
Spot on TK.
As always, switching to *NIX solves it all [8D]

A MAC would do it now when they are able to run on INTEL, I would however use OpenBSD instead.
Answered 08/31/2009 by: AngelD
Red Belt

Please log in to comment
Answer this question or Comment on this question for clarity