/build/static/layout/Breadcrumb_cap_w.png

Citrix Client 10.150

I have been trying different things with the client packager (/a option). Installing to both locally and network locations, etc but no matter what I choose on the compression method screen it still ends up defaulting to the uncompressed compression method. Neither the single MSI, nor the compressed option work for me, and I have tried this on different computers and everything. Any ideas, or has any one else run into this issue?

0 Comments   [ + ] Show comments

Answers (5)

Posted by: stellex 16 years ago
Yellow Belt
0
Nope, I am just trying to do the initial administrative install where it has the three compression options nothing more nothing less, and no matter which of those three I choose during that administrative install it always defaults to the uncompressed.
Posted by: anonymous_9363 16 years ago
Red Belt
0
So, what's 'the client packager'? Is it a tool supplied by Citrix? I read it as if you were creating a normal Windows Installer administrative installation point (MSIExec /A [MSI]).
Posted by: AngelD 16 years ago
Red Belt
0
Doing an administrative installation will always change the media to external files (instead of streamed or external cabinet).
Posted by: anonymous_9363 16 years ago
Red Belt
0
ORIGINAL: AngelD
Doing an administrative installation will always change the media to external files (instead of streamed or external cabinet).
Here's where I'm confused. The OP specifically refers to a 'client packager' but then implies he's doing an admin install. THEN he says 'no matter what I choose on the compression method screen it still ends up defaulting to the uncompressed compression method.' That makes no sense for an admin install since, as you say, you have no option.

Maybe he'll post back to clarify...
Posted by: anonymous_9363 16 years ago
Red Belt
0
It sounds to me like you're adding files to a transform and expecting it to use internal CAB files? AFAIK, that can't be done. If you *have* to have internal CABs, your only option would be to add the files to the MSI directly, something which is actively discouraged.
Rating comments in this legacy AppDeploy message board thread won't reorder them,
so that the conversation will remain readable.
 
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site and/or clicking the "Accept" button you are providing consent Quest Software and its affiliates do NOT sell the Personal Data you provide to us either when you register on our websites or when you do business with us. For more information about our Privacy Policy and our data protection efforts, please visit GDPR-HQ