K1000 and thin clients

Is anyone out there installing the K1000 agent on thin clients for management?  Do you have them siloed in a seperate org?  We're considering doing this, but we are nervous about the tiny hard drives potentially filling up.  It seems the best mitigation for that problem is to have them in a seperate org.  Any thoughts or Personal experiance would be greatly appreciated.


0 Comments   [ + ] Show comments

Answers (2)

Answer Summary:
Posted by: jdornan 10 years ago
Red Belt

KACE is untested on any OS such as XP embedded

  • I guess I better get to testing it! :) - awingren 10 years ago
  • I do have a client that is running (with some issues) on XP embedded but would be interested in your results too if you have time to post them. Good Luck! - jdornan 10 years ago
Posted by: jknox 10 years ago
Red Belt

The agent will also run on embedded Win7, but as jdornan mentioned, it's has not been tested nor is it supported.  Things like patching won't work because no embedded OS is in the patch feed.

Vote here on the feature request: https://kace.uservoice.com/forums/82699-k1000/suggestions/2824800-add-support-for-managing-thin-clients-running-wind

  • Patching worked for us with a few thin clients that accidentally got the KACE client deployed to them by group policy. It caused the tiny drive to quickly fill up with patches. - awingren 10 years ago
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site and/or clicking the "Accept" button you are providing consent Quest Software and its affiliates do NOT sell the Personal Data you provide to us either when you register on our websites or when you do business with us. For more information about our Privacy Policy and our data protection efforts, please visit GDPR-HQ