Is anyone out there installing the K1000 agent on thin clients for management?  Do you have them siloed in a seperate org?  We're considering doing this, but we are nervous about the tiny hard drives potentially filling up.  It seems the best mitigation for that problem is to have them in a seperate org.  Any thoughts or Personal experiance would be greatly appreciated.


Answer Summary:
0 Comments   [ - ] Hide Comments


Please log in to comment

Answer this question or Comment on this question for clarity



KACE is untested on any OS such as XP embedded

Answered 02/15/2013 by: jdornan
Red Belt

  • I guess I better get to testing it! :)
  • I do have a client that is running (with some issues) on XP embedded but would be interested in your results too if you have time to post them. Good Luck!
Please log in to comment

The agent will also run on embedded Win7, but as jdornan mentioned, it's has not been tested nor is it supported.  Things like patching won't work because no embedded OS is in the patch feed.

Vote here on the feature request: https://kace.uservoice.com/forums/82699-k1000/suggestions/2824800-add-support-for-managing-thin-clients-running-wind

Answered 02/15/2013 by: jknox
Red Belt

  • Patching worked for us with a few thin clients that accidentally got the KACE client deployed to them by group policy. It caused the tiny drive to quickly fill up with patches.
Please log in to comment