hi ,
I am packaging an app which is having a wrapper exe which calls a msi AdobeAfterEffects ,
which inturn is responsible for the installation of five other msi's ,I am unable to find out where actually
these msi's are being called.

I have found only one msi in the custom actions that to in the deffered mode,

kindly help me to know the sequence .

0 Comments   [ + ] Show Comments


Please log in to comment

Rating comments in this legacy AppDeploy message board thread won't reorder them,
so that the conversation will remain readable.


I'd be willing to bet a fairly substantial wedge that this is being done by function calls to custom DLLs, something which is a) becoming all too common and b) a royal PITA for corporate packagers. Does performing an admin install extract these MSIs? Failing that, enable logging for a normal install: that should at least show you where in the sequence MSIEXEC gets called.
Answered 07/05/2007 by: VBScab
Red Belt

Please log in to comment
Hi Akram,
welcome to the Adobe CS3 affected deployment people! :-(
Look at this thread: http://itninja.com/question/how-do-you-roll-out-new-machines?6716
There, i have quick and dirty posted my findings about this setups so far.
The real installation gets started by the CA 'Adobe_ID0E6B' (at least in Photoshop) in 'WinBootstrapper.msi', it's the second last sequence in 'InstallExecuteSequence'.
What i don't have, are all the necessary prestaging things that the 'setup.exe' (and WinBootstrapper.msi) portion of the installation does.
Maybe, a capture with Wise or IS could enlighten this things.
Hope, this gives you some ideas to dig further.
Typical Adobe again, i must say. Never doit the standard way, allway make it very difficult for Administrators. And it's the same on the OSX-side! :-(
Regards, Nick
Answered 07/06/2007 by: nheim
Tenth Degree Black Belt

Please log in to comment
a verbose log should determine pretty quickly whats going on behind the scenes.
Answered 07/09/2007 by: jmcfadyen
Fifth Degree Black Belt

Please log in to comment
Answer this question or Comment on this question for clarity