ICE Error, never seen before!
Hallo!
Could someone help me?
I´ve got these ICE03 Error that i nerver seen before.
Table: WiseModuleConfiguration Column: ModuleID_Missing specifications in _Validation Table (or Old DataBase)
Table: WiseModuleConfiguartion Column: Name_Missing specifications in _Validation Table (or OLD DataBase)
Table: WiseModuleConfiguration Column: Value MIssing specifications in _Validation Table (or Old DataBase)
How can i fix them?
What is wrong?
Could someone help me?
I´ve got these ICE03 Error that i nerver seen before.
Table: WiseModuleConfiguration Column: ModuleID_Missing specifications in _Validation Table (or Old DataBase)
Table: WiseModuleConfiguartion Column: Name_Missing specifications in _Validation Table (or OLD DataBase)
Table: WiseModuleConfiguration Column: Value MIssing specifications in _Validation Table (or Old DataBase)
How can i fix them?
What is wrong?
0 Comments
[ + ] Show comments
Answers (6)
Please log in to answer
Posted by:
brenthunter2005
18 years ago
Dont worry about them. (or Old Database) is the key word here.
Posted by:
Jts71
18 years ago
ORIGINAL: Jts71
Hallo!
Could someone help me?
I´ve got these ICE03 Error that i nerver seen before.
Table: WiseModuleConfiguration Column: ModuleID_Missing specifications in _Validation Table (or Old DataBase)
Table: WiseModuleConfiguartion Column: Name_Missing specifications in _Validation Table (or OLD DataBase)
Table: WiseModuleConfiguration Column: Value MIssing specifications in _Validation Table (or Old DataBase)
How can i fix them?
What is wrong?
I solved it.
I just added it in the _Validation Table as this:
Table Column Nullable
WiseModuleConfiguration ModuleID_ Y
WiseModuleConfiguration Name_ Y
WiseModuleConfiguration Value Y
Posted by:
brenthunter2005
18 years ago
That will be why you received this ICE message.
Ideally, you should be using the Windows Installer 2.0 schema. It is alot more reliable that the old 1.x schemas (especially with multiple user scenarios etc).
Ideally, you should be using the Windows Installer 2.0 schema. It is alot more reliable that the old 1.x schemas (especially with multiple user scenarios etc).
Rating comments in this legacy AppDeploy message board thread won't reorder them,so that the conversation will remain readable.