/build/static/layout/Breadcrumb_cap_w.png

Anyone having issues deploying Dot net 4.5.2 as a post install task on K2000?

Hi all,


I am trying to install MS dot net 4.5.2 as a postinstall task on K2000, task is set as an application, runtime envor set as windows and command line is

NDP452-KB2901907-x86-x64-AllOS-ENU.exe /q /norestart

it always prompts for the Eula and a finish button, I want it to be silent and seamless..


0 Comments   [ + ] Show comments

Answers (5)

Answer Summary:
Zip it, launch with batch file, use "/q /norestart"
Posted by: SMal.tmcc 9 years ago
Red Belt
0
3 solutions I know of to install with other management systems.

using /passive instead of /q

run it from a batch file

or extract the package with 7zip and run the setup.exe silently
Posted by: EdT 9 years ago
Red Belt
0
If you run the exe from a command line with the /? switch, it will give you the available command switches to extract the content. Running an extracted MSI is usually cleaner than running the EXE.
Posted by: ma034001 9 years ago
White Belt
0
Thanks both, after much Googling I tried extracting and running the various MSI's that are contained , also tried setup /? but all to no avail.  it seems to install as expected on a normal client, but when run as a posttask it prompts for Eula, very annoying for a silent build !  I'm currently trying the batch script method so fingers crossed
Posted by: ma034001 9 years ago
White Belt
0
Well , its very early and not fully tested but zipping the dotnet452 file and a batch file that copies it to C drive and runs it (I know an overkill - but its a tried and tested method documented on this site - and works well for me for so far !) then I ran the dotnet452.exe with /passive and it seems to have so far installed silently with no message box, so thanks to SMal.tmcc (again !)
Posted by: cblake 9 years ago
Red Belt
0
Zip it, launch with batch file, use  "/q /norestart" - that should take case of any possible cause. 
Ultimately it comes down to how it's being called and executed most of the time. 

Comments:
  • :) many thanks, yeah it does seem to be a tried and tested option for deploying apps.. - ma034001 9 years ago
 
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site and/or clicking the "Accept" button you are providing consent Quest Software and its affiliates do NOT sell the Personal Data you provide to us either when you register on our websites or when you do business with us. For more information about our Privacy Policy and our data protection efforts, please visit GDPR-HQ