Could someone tell me why I should use administrative install vs. normal install when installing eg. Adobe Flash Player?

I noticed that this is what Adobe recommends in their administrative guide but I have always just used normal install with no problems.


Does administrative install give you any real benefits or is it just a relic from old days?


Best Regards,


Answer Summary:
0 Comments   [ - ] Hide Comments


Please log in to comment

Community Chosen Answer



This is one of those areas which is confused in Windows Installer.

There are 2 scenarios, in essence: an install using an account with local administrative privileges and an install to an Administrative Installation Point (AIP). The former is - I hope - obvious. The latter is the creation of a point on a network share, from which all installs are conducted.

When creating an AIP, you use the '/a' argument to MSIExec.EXE. You are prompted for a location for the AIP. The MSI then extracts uncompressed copies of the files within the package, along with a revised MSI. You would then use *this* MSI for your deployments.

*In general*, most people use AIPs where packages are to be patched: one creates the AIP, applies patches to the AIP and then deploy the patched package.

Answered 02/06/2014 by: VBScab
Red Belt

Please log in to comment
Answer this question or Comment on this question for clarity



Hi VBScab

So in effect the only reason to creating an administrative image is if I want to apply patches to this image before installing?

Answered 02/06/2014 by: RoejbaekDK
Senior Yellow Belt

  • Sorry for the delay...busy.

    Pretty much. It's also a handy tool to check out the content of a package: folder structure, etc.
    • No worries :)

      Thx.. I thought as much, but nice to get confirmation from one of the gurus ;)
Please log in to comment